UNITED

NATIONS

 

 

A

 

 

General Assembly

 

 

 

Distr.

GENERAL

 

A/HRC/7/39

28 February 2008

 

Original: ENGLISH, SPANISH

 

 

HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL                                                                          

Seventh session

Agenda item 2

 

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND REPORTS OF THE OFFICE OF THE HIGH COMMISSIONER AND OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL

 

Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the situation of human rights in Colombia*   **

 

Summary

 

The document describes the main developments in Colombia during 2007 regarding the situation of human rights and international humanitarian law, covered by the agreement between the Government of Colombia and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), which was renewed in 2007 and remains in force until October 2010. The report highlights the fact that the intertwined dynamics of the internal armed conflict, drug-trafficking and organized crime continue to weigh heavily on the human rights situation. At the same time, the report notes the persistence of structural problems in certain State institutions. Throughout the year, the need to guarantee the rights of all victims of violations of human rights and breaches of humanitarian law was placed at the centre of public debate. The document stresses that it is urgent and imperative to make a proper and timely response to their claims.

         

Some of the challenges to be faced relate to the consolidation of the demobilization of the paramilitaries, and the emergence of new illegal armed groups; both of them directly affect human rights. The magnitude of the tasks pending in the judicial proceedings under Law 975/2005 of 2005 (the “Justice and Peace Law”), and the persistence of obstacles to its full application, are causes of uncertainty and concern. There are important challenges in relation to the need to guarantee the participation of the victims in these processes. At the same time, the Supreme Court’s investigations, despite many obstacles and even threats, have made good progress in showing how seriously public institutions and society at large have been infiltrated by the paramilitaries and their organizations.

 

During 2007, political decisions and measures were taken by the highest civilian and military authorities to counter the persistent extrajudicial executions attributed to the State security forces. The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia-People´s Army (FARC-EP) guerrillas and, to a lesser degree, the National Liberation Army (ELN), have not stopped committing serious breaches of international humanitarian law.

 

Approximately 45 per cent of the population lives below the poverty line, including the majority of displaced persons; this situation hinders the full enjoyment of their rights. This report also includes information and analysis on disturbing human rights situations in groups that are especially vulnerable, including the victims of the internal armed conflict, displaced persons, indigenous groups, Afro-Colombians, women, trade unionists, human rights defenders, journalists and children. The report also summarizes the activities of the office in Colombia of OHCHR (the Office of the United High Commissioner for Human Rights) during 2007 and presents eight recommendations which, if carried out, would help to bring about a notable improvement in the situation of human rights and humanitarian law.

 


 

CONTENTS

                                                                                                                   Paragraph            Page

          Summary………………………………………………                               

          Introduction………………………………………………………. 1 – 3              

I.       THE POLITICAL CONTEXT………………………………………       4 – 9              

II       THE HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL

HUMANITARIAN LAW SITUATION……………………………        10-79                     

      A.   State authorities……………………………………………         12-38

             B.   The demobilization processes……………………………….. 39-43                     

       C.   Guerrilla groups………………………………………………         44-48                     

       D.   Situations of special concern and particularly                                                           

              vulnerable groups…………………………………………… 49-79                               

III.     ACTIVITIES OF THE OFFICE IN COLOMBIA ………………..          80-91                     

IV.     RECOMMENDATIONS…………………………………………...       92-94                     

 

Annex

 

Representative cases of violations of human rights and breaches

of international humanitarian law………………………………...                          

 


 

 INTRODUCTION

 

 

1.       On 26 November 1996, the Government of Colombia and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)  agreed on the establishment of an office in Colombia of OHCHR, which opened in April 1997. Its mandate is to assist the Colombian authorities in developing policies and programmes to promote and protect human rights, to advise civil society on matters of human rights, to observe the situation of human rights and international humanitarian law in the context of the violence and the internal armed conflict, and to submit its reports and analyses to the High Commissioner.

 

2.       The High Commissioner visited Colombia from 7 to 9 September 2007 to sign an agreement with the Government of Colombia to extend the office in Colombia’s mandate[1] in its entirety up to 30 October 2010. After 10 years of activities, the High Commissioner wishes to express her acknowledgement to the Colombian people and to the authorities for having welcomed and cooperated with the Office. The High Commissioner also extends her gratitude to those countries and organizations which have given support to the office in Colombia, and contributed to the promotion and protection of human rights.

 

3.       This report covers the period from January to December 2007, focusing on the most significant aspects of the office in Colombia’s mandate. It is based on the following activities: systematic and analytical observations of the human rights situation, including field visits, the processing of complaints, the analysis of reports and statistics, interviews with State authorities, victims, other representatives of civil society, United Nations agencies in Colombia, bodies from the international community and NGOs.

 

I. THE POLITICAL CONTEXT

 

4.       Colombia has been seriously affected by an internal armed conflict for more than 40 years. It has also become increasingly evident that the illegal armed groups are directly or indirectly involved in drug-trafficking,[2] and are associated with local and international networks of organized crime and corruption. The complex relationships between all these factors, added to persistent structural problems such as impunity and limitations of access to justice, inequality and discrimination, continue to affect the human rights situation negatively. That said, it must be recognized that Colombia has made progress in restoring security throughout the country in recent years,[3] and the visibility given to human rights in the public agenda is a solid achievement.

 

5.       During 2007, the most relevant political and security-related events with an impact on the human rights situation were: (a) the judicial proceedings against demobilized paramilitary leaders under Law 975/2005, known as the “Justice and Peace Law”;[4] (b) judicial investigations into the activities of a number of high-level public servants for their alleged links with paramilitary groups;[5] (c) the emergence or consolidation of a range of new illegal armed groups following the paramilitary demobilization process, some of them having strong links with organized crime and drug-trafficking; and (d) the holding of regional and local elections.

 

6.       The security forces continued to implement “el plan de guerra” (war plan) against illegal armed groups, in particular against the guerrillas, through the “Plan Consolidación”, which replaced the former “Plan Patriota”. The intensity of hostilities frequently had a negative impact on the civilian population, and breaches of international humanitarian law were attributed to all armed actors. Several new illegal armed groups[6]  emerged, building up strength and engaging in violent acts in certain regions. FARC-EP and ELN persisted in their violent disruptions of public order and continued to infringe international humanitarian law. A number of organizations – including the Organization of American States’ Mission to Support the Peace Process in Colombia (MAPP/OEA) – raised the alert on guerrilla activities in specific areas, formerly under demobilized paramilitary groups’ control.[7] According to the security forces, there was an increase in militia-type activities by the guerrillas as they retreated from the regular forces´ offensives. These dynamics are more directly observed in the south of the Department of Córdoba, in the Urabá-Chocó area, eastern Antioquia, the north of Santander, the north of Tolima, Nariño, Putumayo, Guaviare, Vichada and Arauca.

 

7.       The Government authorized and sponsored a number of initiatives of its own[8] and of third parties, to make contact with FARC-EP, with varying degrees of support. Its intention was to find agreements which would lead to the release of hostages in exchange for imprisoned guerrillas and, perhaps, eventually lead to peace talks. There was enormous consternation when the 11 deputies from the Departmental Assembly of Valle del Cauca had been murdered,[9] after being held by FARC-EP since 2002. Their death was met with a unanimous outcry by Colombians, leading to massive protests, and a widespread movement of public opinion urging the release of all the kidnap victims. A mixture of shock and grief also shook the nation with the publication of pictures of the hostages and letters written by them to their families, seized by the authorities from FARC-EP agents in late November, which showed their deplorable situation. All of this reminded people at home and abroad that those who fall into the hands of illegal armed groups remain permanently defenceless and vulnerable. Some of them have already been held for as long as 10 years.[10]

 

8.       On 28 October 2007 elections were held nationwide for regional and local authorities. Governors and members of local assemblies were elected in the 32 departments, mayors and councillors in 1,094 municipalities, four metropolitan districts, and for local wards. Candidates were nominated from a broad range of political groups.[11] The voter turnout was high and the results confirmed the country’s political plurality. The mobilization of the forces of law and order contributed to security at the polls. During the polling day, a climate of normality prevailed. However, before and after that day, there were isolated acts of violence[12]. There were death threats and even murders in some places, mainly by guerrilla groups (especially FARC-EP), although some were attributed to members of the new illegal armed groups, drug-traffickers and criminal gangs who threatened the lives of numerous candidates and restricted their political activities.[13] A total of eight aspiring candidates and 23 registered candidates were murdered; four aspiring candidates and five registered candidates were kidnapped.[14]

 

9.       Another important aspect of the political context was the continuation of the dialogue among the Government, civil society and the international community, which led to the  III International Congress on Colombia, held in Bogotá in November 2007. The final declaration reaffirmed the need to continue with efforts to achieve results [in applying the recommendations of the High Commissioner] as quickly as possible.[15]

 

II. THE HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW SITUATION

 

10.     Although there are some encouraging signs of improvement, the situation of human rights and international humanitarian law remains a matter of concern, particularly in regions in which the dynamics of internal armed conflict have become more intense.

 

11.     The authorities, especially the Government, welcomed the High Commissioner’s recommendations and cooperation in general, renewing their commitment to full implementation, while acknowledging that there are still challenges to be faced and shortcomings to be remedied. However, major efforts and additional measures must be sustained and reinforced over a long period of time if they are to be really effective. This should include coordinated and convergent actions by all sectors and institutions of the State and civil society. Specific efforts must be made to prevent victims’ demands from  becoming invisible and thus irrelevant. The fulfilment of the rights of victims of the armed conflict to truth, justice, and reparation, and the guarantee of non-repetition, are essential conditions for a transition towards lasting peace and national reconciliation.

 

A.   State authorities

 

1.      The fight against impunity

 

12.     Structural problems persist in the administration of justice. These include the under-reporting of crimes to the authorities, the difficulties of access to the judicial system, the insufficiency of funds and technological resources (despite increased budgets), the lack of uniform criteria in the application of the law, the high workload of judges and prosecutors, the slow pace of proceedings, and cases of corruption. During 2007 some progress was made in opening up channels to combat impunity, particularly in judicial proceedings under Law 975/2005 against demobilized paramilitary leaders whose depositions represent a first step in clarifying past events.[16]  Investigations have also been undertaken by the Supreme Court and the Attorney General´s Office against high-level civilian and military officials for alleged links with paramilitary groups and corruption.

 

13.     Investigations into the storming of the Palace of Justice by the M-19 guerrilla group and its recovery by the army in 1986, and others related to the murders of members of the Unión Patriotica were reopened.[17]  The courts also handed down decisions against members of the security forces who perpetrated extrajudicial executions, as in the cases of the three trade unionists murdered in August 2004 at Caño Seco in Saravena, Arauca, and the farmer murdered in April 2004 in the village of La Hondita in El Peñol, Antioquia. In both cases the military patrols reported that the victims had been “shot in combat”, and the courts found that they were not. The Attorney General´s Office also ordered the detention of an army captain for the massacre of five adults and three children in San José de Apartadó, Antioquia, in February 2005.

 

14.     At the international level, the Inter-American Court on Human Rights has ruled against the Colombian State, which accepted responsibility for the extrajudicial execution of an indigenous leader in the Nasa community, Cauca, by members of the armed forces in February 1988. In another case in which the State has also accepted responsibility, the same Court found that paramilitaries, with the collaboration of State agents, were guilty of the massacre of 12 officers of the judiciary[18] in January 1989 in La Rochela, Santander.

 

(a)   Investigations into links between public officials and private enterprise with paramilitary groups

 

15.     The Supreme Court of Justice opened investigations into the activities of 45 members of Congress for their alleged links with paramilitary groups. The accused are from 16 different departments; 18 of them have been imprisoned. Others under investigation include four former departmental governors and 18 former mayors. In November, the Procurator General dismissed the Director of the Administrative Department of Security (DAS) and barred him from holding public office for 18 years, for having collaborated with paramilitary groups and taken part in acts of corruption. All of these investigations have revealed the extent of paramilitary infiltration within the State through alliances with politicians and the support of certain private companies.[19] The Supreme Court has given clear evidence of its strength and independence, which reinforces the possibility to further expose other paramilitary connections with members of public and private institutions.

 

16.     Despite these very important cases, there remain serious structural problems for the efficacy of the justice system, as mentioned before. The full introduction of the accusatory system in the criminal courts, due to be completed by early 2008, is intended to help combat impunity at all levels.

 

(b)   Judicial proceedings under Law 975/2005, the “Justice and Peace Law”

 

17.     Law 975/2005 regulates the procedures to be followed with demobilized members of illegal armed groups and establishes judicial benefits based on their contribution to justice and reparation. In 2007, 3,127 of the 31,671 demobilized paramilitaries[20] were candidates for benefits under Law 975/2005. As at 19 December 2007, the Attorney General´s Office had begun the process of receiving 1,057 voluntary depositions; of these, 941 depositions were closed because the deponents did not ratify their willingness to be processed according to Law 975/2005. A total of 542 candidates for benefits are in prison. The Attorney General´s Office has also registered 121,547 victims. There is a marked contrast between the large number of cases and the limited progress made – during 2007 not a single indictment was issued. This shows the size of the Attorney General´s challenges, and supports many of the concerns and doubts about the process.

 

18.     Some of the victims and some human rights defenders have pointed out that the information revealed by the demobilized paramilitaries is often neither complete nor truthful. It is evident, too, that the statements made by the majority of these paramilitaries often attempt to justify – and even openly claim credit for – the acts committed by their organizations. This leads to real risks to the lives and safety of those victims who participate in proceedings.[21] At the same time, the flow of information that has come to light as a result of these depositions has exposed the enormous dimensions of paramilitary criminal activity,[22] and the unspeakable details of events hitherto unknown to the authorities – let alone the public.[23] These new disclosures generate legitimate concern about the group of approximately 19,000 demobilized paramilitaries who have not submitted to Law 975/2005 and have no formal investigation open against them.[24]

 

19.     There is a growing consensus regarding the need for new professional and technical resources for the Attorney General´s Office, the Procurator General and the judicial system. There must also be renewed national and international political support in order to reinforce the judicial and political processes of the Justice and Peace Law.

 

20.     Another challenge lies in the implementation of mechanisms to guarantee security for the victims to participate and to receive reparations. This will have to be a central issue in 2008 if the Attorney General´s Office takes the steps that should follow the depositions of the paramilitary leaders.[25]

 

2.      Extrajudicial executions

 

21.     The persistence of extrajudicial executions attributed to members of the security forces, especially members of the Army, has prompted the Government to strengthen the control mechanisms. The political will of senior civilian and military personnel to adopt measures which will prevent, investigate, punish and expose situations in which this type of action has occurred has been most evident in their discussions with the Office during 2007; and they acknowledge that serious crimes, such as extrajudicial executions, do not even achieve any kind of military advantage.

 

22.     New directives produced this year by senior Ministry of Defence officials and military authorities[26] have emphasized technical and regulatory matters. These directives could serve as the practical basis for a comprehensive attempt to deal with allegations of extrajudicial executions attributed to the security forces. The office in Colombia will closely and regularly monitor implementation and results in 2008. All these measures follow the orientation of several recommendations made by this office, and it is expected that they will be fully developed in the document on integral policies of human rights and international humanitarian law to be published by the Ministry of Defence in early 2008. The Government has also asserted that the Military Criminal Justice has a restrictive area of action and should be limited to exceptional cases, as stated in the presidential objection to the bill containing a new Military Criminal Code.[27] Adjustments were also made to adopt the accusatory system within the Military Criminal Justice. Other Army measures included the deployment of operational legal advisers; the strengthening of internal controls; the reinforcement of its human rights offices; and training on the application of guidelines for personnel who are the “primary responsible authority” to preserve evidence for the Attorney General´s Office.

 

23.     There is an abundance of guidelines within the military, and an expanded policy of training in human rights and international humanitarian law. Nevertheless, there is still much to be done towards the effective implementation of these principles within the security forces.

 

24.     The office in Colombia continues to receive complaints of extrajudicial executions attributed to the security forces Some common characteristics of the complaints are the following: the victims are represented as having being killed in combat; the scene of the crime has been tampered with before the bodies were identified; and often investigations have been initiated by the Military Criminal Justice system. Official investigations reveal that the underlying motives in several of these cases may be related to pressure on the military to show results, or to false claims of success in action by certain members of the security forces to obtain benefits and recognition.

 

25.     The complaints also indicate that the victims included some who might have been linked to new illegal armed groups, such as in Toluviejo in June 2007, where six young men, apparently recruited by unidentified persons, were found dead several days later and were reported as having been killed in combat in Chinú, Córdoba, by the Unified Action Group for Personal Liberty (GAULA) of Army Brigade 11.

 

26.     It is urgent to identify internal obstacles so that the policies described above can become fully operative. There is also a need to make progress in the review, design and implementation of new models of tactical training to be used at the level of operative units, and to analyse lessons learned.

 

27.     At the same time, OHCHR welcomes the decision taken by the military leadership regarding the June 2007 incident in Balsillas, Caquetá, when two soldiers shot six people (including a minor).  The immediate reaction of the military commanders was to send the case to the civilian jurisdiction, where the soldiers were tried and sentenced in just three months.

 

28.     If extrajudicial executions are to be totally eradicated, the Attorney General´s Office and the control agencies need to have greater commitment. The Attorney General´s Office has created a special unit to conduct investigations of extrajudicial executions. The complexity and dimensions of this problem require the allocation of sufficient technical and budgetary resources, and appropriate training for the investigation team.

 

3. Enforced disappearances

 

29.     So far, the depositions by demobilized paramilitary leaders have revealed the location of 1,009 clandestine graves within their respective zones of influence or control. This has made it possible to recover the remains of 1,196 victims, most of whom have not yet been identified (440 were reported as preliminary identified, and 118 fully identified bodies have been returned to the families).[28] The process has certainly revealed the way in which these extremely serious crimes were systematically committed by paramilitary groups, and the widespread practice of enforced disappearance in Colombia in recent years.

 

30.     It is urgent to redirect the processes of exhumation so that many more bodies can be properly identified. This will only happen if there is greater effort to facilitate the participation of the victims’ families in the processes of investigation, in line with international standards. Colombian and foreign forensic experts have already made this recommendation to the authorities. The National Plan for the Search of the Disappeared, issued in February 2007, favors collective and regional investigations, thus facilitating the identification of patterns and optimizing the efforts to identify the remains. But the Plan has barely gone into operation. There have been positive experiences in the application of this type of approach in Santa Marta, Magdalena, and Yopal, Casanare, which are worth perfecting and extending to other regions, with the inclusion of guarantees for the relatives.

 

4.      Torture and the excessive use of force

 

31.     The office in Colombia has received information on cases of torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment and the excessive use of force by members of the security forces. In Cesar, complaints have stated that in some extrajudicial executions attributed to Army personnel, the victims had been tortured.

 

32.     Likewise, the office in Colombia received information on torture inflicted on soldiers by their superiors in Bogotá, and it was also informed of cases of torture attributed to members of the National Police in certain police stations or during patrols in Bogotá, Huila and Norte de Santander. In the first of these cases, six officers in Bogotá were removed from active service. The office in Colombia is also following up complaints on excessive use of force by members of the Police Force’s Mobile Anti-Riot Squad (ESMAD) in Chocó and Putumayo.

 

33.     Cases were reported of abuses allegedly committed by members of the police against the transgender population engaged in prostitution in Bogotá, Medellin and Cali.

 

 

5.      Illegal or arbitrary detentions

 

34.     Complaints were made about illegal or arbitrary detentions in which warrants were exclusively based on the testimony of former guerrillas, which was not properly corroborated by other evidence. In Cesar, 11 people were arrested and presented to the media as guerrillas, and had to be released several days later for lack of proper evidence. The same happened to another 12 detainees in Santander.

 

35.     Some judicial decisions have questioned the impartiality of witnesses, such as former guerrillas or paramilitaries who receive economic benefits for their testimonies. This happened in the case of a human rights defender in Santander who spent 14 months in prison on the basis of the testimony of two former guerrillas, and was later acquitted when it was shown to be false.

 

6.      The situation in prisons

 

36.     According to official data, overcrowding in prisons has reached an average of 20.6 per cent, and the situation is much worse in some establishments. The Government intends to build 11 new prisons during its remaining two and a half years of office. The current situation requires additional efforts and measures to meet the basic needs of prisoners, such as health, food, sanitation, legal advice and expert assistance, and others such as family visits, education and work projects. Steps already taken to implement an educational model and work training should be extended to a greater number of inmates. The continuing need for differential treatment of women prisoners, indigenous people, Afro-Colombians, lesbian, gay, bisexual , and transgender persons (LGBTs) and AIDS sufferers within the prison system is still a matter of concern.

 

37.     The National Penitentiary and Prison Institute (INPEC) has indicated that it will amend Law 65/1993 (Penitentiary Code) and reform the General Regulations for Penitentiaries and Prisons, to respond to the above-mentioned issues.

 

38.     Finally, Law 975/2005 implies new challenges in the design of a criminal policy. This refers particularly to the security risks caused by the complex situations arising when those formerly involved with paramilitary, guerilla and common criminal groups are brought together in the same facility.

 

B.   The demobilization processes

 

39.     After the formal end of the collective demobilization, the Casanare Rural Self-Defense Group is the only remaining paramilitary group recognized during the negotiation process  that is still operating.[29] As per the information directly collected by the office in Colombia, there is still concern that the new illegal armed groups operating in the Departments of Meta, Vichada and Guaviare, and there have been actions in Nariño attributed to the self-styled Nueva Generación (“New Generation”), as was already mentioned in the High Commissioner’s report of 2006 (E/CN.4/2006/9). These groups are heavily armed, have a military organization and responsible leaders, and have the capacity to control territory and to conduct military operations against other armed actors. They represent an active factor in intensifying the armed conflict, with direct and serious consequences for the civilian population. There has been information suggesting that certain members of the armed forces have links with actions attributed to these groups, or take an acquiescent or tolerant attitude to them.

 

40.     There are also serious challenges to the consolidation of the demobilization process, precisely because of the emergence of new illegal armed groups.[30] The structures, interests and modus operandi of these groups are not homogeneous, and the use of identical terms to describe them often conceals a wide variety of different activities, aims and alliances. However, whatever their denomination, they remain a legitimate source of concern because they continue to inflict violence on the civilian population,[31] for example, in the Departments of Chocó, Valle del Cauca, and Putumayo. The extensive use of the name Aguilas Negras (Black Eagles) by several of the existing groups, although they apparently do not belong to a single structure, has created confusion and has occasionally enabled these groups to divert attention from their real importance. For this reason, the simple description of these new structures as “criminal gangs”, does not take into account the complexity, variety and plurality of the phenomenon and the danger it implies. Official figures report that the armed forces killed more than three times as many members of such groups in 2007 as they did in 2006.[32]

 

41.     The authorities have detected that former middle-ranking cadres from previous paramilitary groups act as heads of some of these new groups, and that a number of low-level demobilized members operate in areas which were once zones of influence of the paramilitaries. Information received by the office in Colombia claims that these groups maintain links with demobilized paramilitary leaders who have accepted the terms of Law 975/2005. The Attorney General´s Office is investigating demobilized paramilitary leaders accused of continuing with their criminal activities from their cells in Itagui, Antioquia.

 

42.     Many of these groups have been engaged exclusively in illegal activities which imply a control of territory and of the population, such as drug-trafficking, extortion, security-related actions, racketeering and other illegal activities. These have often led to violent disputes among the criminals themselves. Their activity is making a noticeable impact on the population in the form of murders,[33] massacres, acts of “social cleansing”,[34] death threats and child recruitment,[35] evidencing the need for ever greater efforts by the authorities to combat these new groups and investigate their possible links with public servants and local government officials. Likewise, the economic influence of these groups tends to encourage corruption amongst authorities.

 

43.     The Government considers security and development to be central to sustainable reintegration of demobilized persons, admittedly aware that the persistence of drug-trafficking and other illegal activities facilitates the relapse of former combatants and renews the capacity for recruitment of all illegal armed groups. The Presidential Advisory Office for Reinsertion is implementing a number of projects for the effective reintegration of the demobilized population. However, it faces serious challenges in trying to secure greater participation of regional and municipal authorities and the business sector to offer alternative means of employment to the demobilized and guarantee their security. This Office draws attention to the fact that many of the victims who have not received reparations in the judicial proceedings under Law 975/2005 perceive the efforts described here as a form of “revictimization” that offends their personal dignity and sense of justice.

 

C.   Guerrilla groups

 

44.     The FARC-EP continued to disregard their duty to respect international humanitarian law. They have committed grave and systematic breaches such as massacres, murders, the taking of hostages, the planting of antipersonnel mines, acts of sexual violence, recruitment of children (boys and girls) and terrorist acts. Among their many crimes, members of this group were said to be responsible for two massacres in May and August 2007 with 10 victims (among them a girl) perpetrated in Turbo, Antioquia, as well as the murder of 11 Vall